Risk Assessment Mechanism
Rating Form Tool
--> ( Written in Perl then php )
Model of Assessment Phases
Research (Inside the Research looking Out)
1) Pre / History based - steps
2) During / Safety based + Clear milestones + Possible Physical Risk
3) Reflective / Dependencies on other research
4) Post / Possible effect on other research
5) Commercial Assessment / Commercialization viability
6) Ethical Positioning / Alignment Risk
EcoSystem (Outside the Research looking at the Research)
7) Adoption
8) Containment
9) Job creation
10) Expertise alignment / Resources /
11) Venue requirements
12) Venue availability
Alignment (Outside the Research looking at other Research)
13) Alignment to other research
14) Research Overlap
15) Differentiation / Marketability / Market understanding-adoption
16) Investments in related efforts ( Commercial and Public )
17) Media / public information proliferation
References Section Input required. An FTP type dropbox of the complete versions of these references will be provided.
Filtering model - Distill to ?3 numbers
--------------------------------
Multi - Input
Average all input in the three sections.
Review outlying 5% and
- highlight and re-average
- re-poll reviewers with these outlying questions.
Assign a number to each reviewer. Request input on each reviewers current activities. Track reviewer activities vrs review input to create a reviewer trend model. This is interesting to find a norm and to see what percentage of liberal researchers are conservative reviewers ( polar ).
Reviewer Feedback
Provide a graphical feedback mechanism (e.g. one dot for their current work, another for their input, another for the average input, and some stats on specialty vrs review input ). The two feedback granularities are this review, and for overall reviews.
--> ( Written in Perl then php )
Model of Assessment Phases
Research (Inside the Research looking Out)
1) Pre / History based - steps
2) During / Safety based + Clear milestones + Possible Physical Risk
3) Reflective / Dependencies on other research
4) Post / Possible effect on other research
5) Commercial Assessment / Commercialization viability
6) Ethical Positioning / Alignment Risk
EcoSystem (Outside the Research looking at the Research)
7) Adoption
8) Containment
9) Job creation
10) Expertise alignment / Resources /
11) Venue requirements
12) Venue availability
Alignment (Outside the Research looking at other Research)
13) Alignment to other research
14) Research Overlap
15) Differentiation / Marketability / Market understanding-adoption
16) Investments in related efforts ( Commercial and Public )
17) Media / public information proliferation
References Section Input required. An FTP type dropbox of the complete versions of these references will be provided.
Filtering model - Distill to ?3 numbers
--------------------------------
Multi - Input
Average all input in the three sections.
Review outlying 5% and
- highlight and re-average
- re-poll reviewers with these outlying questions.
Assign a number to each reviewer. Request input on each reviewers current activities. Track reviewer activities vrs review input to create a reviewer trend model. This is interesting to find a norm and to see what percentage of liberal researchers are conservative reviewers ( polar ).
Reviewer Feedback
Provide a graphical feedback mechanism (e.g. one dot for their current work, another for their input, another for the average input, and some stats on specialty vrs review input ). The two feedback granularities are this review, and for overall reviews.
Labels: Research